Submission to Senate Inquiry on Small Business Access to Finance

Reference

http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/economics_ctte/small_business_10/index.htm

The structure of the financial system means that large business and governments have easier access to finance than small business. Finance for small business is costly and difficult to obtain.

Finance costs can be substantially reduced by reducing the cost of credit and making it more accessible to all businesses both big and small. The cost of credit can divided into two parts. There is the risk that the credit will be dishonoured and there is the cost of money itself.

Most Australian dollars are created as a result of banks creating interest bearing loans secured against existing assets. Most interest bearing loans are issued by the commercial banks. The Reserve Bank also makes interest bearing loans to banks but this is a small percentage of the loans, and hence money, on issue. Because money is created through interest bearing loans this means that there is a fixed cost of providing money that is in addition to the costs associated with the use of the money. The Reserve Bank also creates notes and coins. These attract no interest. Because notes and coins attract no interest the cost of payments using them is lower than the cost of payments using electronic money. Removing interest from electronic money used for payments will reduce the cost of doing business – particularly for small business.

The reason the financial system generates money through loans backed by existing assets is to ensure that loans get repaid. That is, if the loan is not repaid then the issuing bank can seize the asset and sell it and so repay the loan.

However, money can be created without monetizing existing assets and still ensure the money gets repaid. One way is to put conditions on the use of the money created. Such conditions might be that the money does not earn interest and that it is only used to pay for the receipt of goods and services. We can ensure that the money will get repaid by banning people from using interest free money until their outstanding loans are repaid. Modern technology can automate the enforcement of compliance conditions.

We can use interest free loans judiciously to remove the current disadvantages suffered by small business. These loans will not alter the existing financial system which will continue to provide financial services without interruptions.

Exchange of Value

If the money used to exchange value is NEVER loaned then there is NO risk to the money. Because it is not loaned then it earns no interest. We can create interest free money with the provision that this money only ever moves into other interest free trading accounts.

If interest free money for trading is introduced into the financial system then it can eliminate interest costs on money for trading for small businesses including farmers. It does NOT eliminate credit fees, which may be in the form of interest on the credit, but it eliminates interest on money used for trading. It is the electronic equivalent of cash and will remove the need for most short term overdrafts.

The system works by the credit risk of trades being taken by suppliers rather than banks through overdrafts. Any business that now offers credit to its customers does this today. Any small business that does not get paid immediately by governments and large organisations does this today. With interest free money, that can never earn interest, the supplier can use their own credit to finance purchases from their suppliers. Large businesses, and governments, typically delay payments while insisting on rapid payments from small business and individuals. Interest free credit levels the playing field.

If a customer does not pay a supplier the supplier has to take a loss on the bad loan – just as they do today. The difference is that the bank has not had to replace any money. The interest free money that was used and passed between participating entities is still in the system and so does not have to be replaced by the bank. If a customer does not pay a supplier the debt passes to the supplier and the supplier has used some of their credit without compensation. Suppliers will be careful with issuing credit and will only issue credit to those who are likely to pay.

Payments systems that operate along these lines are sometimes called mutual credit systems or Peer to Peer financing. The Swiss WIR business network has operated this way since 1934. The network has 60,000 Swiss businesses. http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/business/Cash_substitute_greases_business_wheels.html?cid=7613810

A variation on this system that takes advantage of modern communications and computing technology could be easily set up in Australia. The following section is one way it might be implemented.

Interest Free Overdrafts

Any bank, or all banks, that wish to participate can join the system. Businesses and consumers signup to participate in the system. If we assume the fractional reserve for a bank is 10% then the borrower deposits 10% of the credit they need in an interest free account. Initially there will be a limit on the amount of credit that any person or entity can create. Let us assume that it is $5000 for individuals and $100,000 for small business. Governments will lead the way by agreeing to accept payments for taxes and other fees and charges with money from these interest free accounts.

The limit on the total amount of credit available to any borrower is determined by the willingness of other parties to offer credit – not by the availability of money. Suppliers will not offer credit if the buyer is too heavily in debt and so suppliers will rarely increase their credit to accommodate high risk buyers.

This credit money can only be used be used for the transfer of value between participating businesses. The money cannot be lent nor can it earn interest. Because the loan does not earn interest it has a value of zero on the books of the bank and it can be transferred between bank accounts without affecting the books of the bank.

Some businesses will accumulate more interest free money than they need for trading with other parties. They can sell this money back to people who need credit. Because a business has to deposit money to get credit and because credit will dry up if a business has too many loans it will be more attractive for businesses to purchase excess credit money from other businesses than it is to create more credit money.

The net effect of this approach will be that money used for credit between participating businesses will have no interest charges. Credit itself may have an interest charge but that is a matter between the business offering credit and the business borrowing.

Banks still offer a service of overdrafts and they can assist businesses assess the credit worthiness of other potential borrowers and they will charge transaction fees on the movement of money. Banks may find the new system more profitable because they do not have to assess the credit worthiness of each business nor do they take a risk on credit.

Interest free credit will be an alternative to credit and debit cards for individuals. It is expected that merchant and transaction fees will be substantially reduced.

The system is voluntary and does not need any new legislation or new initiatives. It just needs a bank to start offering the service.

Equity Investment

Conceptually equity investment is the same as exchange of value but on a longer time scale. Here, instead of goods being traded, ownership of assets is traded. The current financial system creates money through giving credit by exchanging part ownership of existing assets. This works well for existing assets as the ability of the assets to generate income enables the borrower to fund the credit.

However, credit is generally not available to build future assets. This means that to build new assets money has to be obtained from savings or from loans on existing assets. This increases the financial cost to build new assets as the builder of the new asset has to pay the cost of money plus the cost of the risk of the new asset failing to generate income. It means that relatively little money is available for expansion of assets compared to the amount of money available to purchase existing assets because there is no loans mechanism available to fund new assets.

The lack of money to build new assets stifles productivity gains because productivity improvements come from investments. The lack of money is particularly acute for small business as they do not have the asset base on which to generate money for investment through the creation of loans.

The problem of funding new investment can be overcome by the community (government) providing no interest money for equity investment in NEW assets through the issuing of no interest credit to construct new assets. The money from these loans must be invested in new assets. That is, the money purchases ownership or gives equity in the new assets. How much ownership is transferred and the value of that ownership is a matter between the buyer and the seller.

The main problems with this scheme is that there has to be a limit on how many interest free loans are created and who gets the right to take out interest free loans for investment purposes.

This is an area for government policy. The approach can be used to direct investment in areas of community need where private investment through traditional equity markets is not providing the funds needed to build new productive assets. Small business investment is one area where interest free loans can be given for new investments and the Federal Government is already doing this through the Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research with its commercialisation loans for small business. Unfortunately there is little money available and the administration overheads in running this program are very high – but the principle has been established.

This approach could be broaden to the wider community through giving the right to take out interest free loans to all the population. The money from these loans is required to be invested in areas of need in the community. Such an area is investment in new renewable energy assets or in ways to save energy or to reduce the level of greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. With interest free loans almost all renewable energy investments will be immediately profitable because most of the costs of investment in renewables are finance costs of interest and repayments. Repayments would still be made but there would be no interest costs.

The approach could be made even more effective if the right to loans was given to the population in inverse proportion to their consumption of mains electricity. This would provide positive feedback where the less energy consumed the more investment is made in ways to save energy.

This approach would be particularly important to small business because small business is better able to take advantage of new technologies and to give higher returns to investors.

After the approach is shown to work by reducing greenhouse gas emissions other areas that desperately need investment, such as housing for the homeless, investments in conserving water, public transport and education could all be addressed through the same mechanism. If the right to equity loans is distributed widely throughout the community then small business will be able to compete on an equal footing to large business.

Interest Free Equity Loans requires a government to back the system. The reason is that the decision on where to invest the interest free loans and who is to get the right to such loans is a political decision rather than an economic decision.

Banks Role in Money Creation

Commercial Banks today create most of the new money in circulation in the economy. Almost all the money is created through monetizing existing assets with loans secured against property. When the loans are repaid then the amount of money in circulation reduces in the same way it was created.

If interest free money through selected interest free loans is introduced into the system then the incentive for banks to monetize existing assets to increase the money supply will be reduced. That is, it will become more profitable for banks to lend money they have on deposit and not increase the money supply with any loans. The reason it is more profitable is that banks will take no risk on the money and will only have to ensure that they lend at a higher interest rate than they pay on deposits. The risk of the loans going bad will be taken by the depositors, who may still use the banks to assess the risks, but banks will be paid for those services and not for taking risks themselves.

Banks will also earn fees from the distribution of money generated by no interest loans but again with no risk for the banks on the failure of the equity loans to earn a profit. That risk is taken by the borrowers and for the borrowers it is a lost opportunity cost rather than a direct financial cost.

Government Revenues and Government Infrastructure

Many governments pay a large proportion of their taxes to cover interest payments on infrastructure investments. If governments fund infrastructure with interest free loans they will slowly be relieved of the burden of interest payments. Governments may even choose to pay off debt by issuing their own interest free loans to purchase debt. Interest free loans will not reduce government income but it will make a society that decides to adopt this approach more competitive and no longer reliant on external capital to fund sound investments in its own community. That is it will reduce the need for the Australian economy to borrow money from overseas.

However, it is best if governments themselves do not get interest free loans because there will always be the temptation not to invest in infrastructure but to divert the money to some other purpose. A better way is to give the interest free loans to the population and let the population invest the money.

As an example, suppose a government wants to fund the construction of a large water storage dam to increase the availability of water to a community. The government could give interest free loans to its citizens who in turn have to invest the money in the dam. Rather than simply give all citizens the same amount each citizen could be given an amount that is inversely proportion to the person’s mains water consumption. This would encourage water conservation and the process could be continued over many years to fund other water saving investments. This process would soon eliminate the need for water restrictions as individuals changed their behaviour to earn water loans.

Costs and Social Outcomes

These systems are inexpensive to implement and could be operational within a few months once the political decision has been made to implement them. The running costs would be less than the cost of existing systems because risk is dispersed and most processes will be automated.

Costs are minimised because the existing monetary system remains intact and there are no changes to the existing system. This means there is no disruption to commerce.

As well as benefiting small business these systems can be constructed to benefit all individuals in our society. This contrasts with the current financial system which gives great advantage to wealthy people and large business, at the expense of individuals and small business. This comes about because the wealthy and large business have much greater access to loans than the rest of the society.

However, it does not disadvantage the wealthy or big business through higher taxes or charges. Instead allows all citizens to share more equally in new wealth creation and in the profits from day to day trading.

Financing the Building of the Cotter Dam

The ACT government is going to build a dam on the Cotter River to store an extra 70 gigalitres of water for use when there is little or no water in the rivers.  Over a period of 40 years we can expect the dam to fill at least twice and for at least 140 gigalitres of extra water to be sold during that period.
Continue reading

Financing Investment in Energy Sustainability for the ACT

The primary requirement for the  ACT to achieve sustainability is sustainability in Energy. With abundant cheap sustainable energy it is possible to address other problems through the application of energy whether it be the provision of water, food, shelter, transport or clean air. To that end the primary focus for any sustainable future should be on the ACT producing renewable sustainable energy and increasing  energy efficiency

In this document energy sustainable means that the citizens of the ACT will produce all the energy they require without contributing to the level of green house gases in the atmosphere. To achieve this goal within ten years will require the investment of about one billion dollars per year for the next ten years.
Continue reading

Taking the Interest out of Loans

This article has been submitted to online opinion. If it appears there a link will be made to the article.

The world is experiencing a Global Financial Crisis. It is called a Financial Crisis because it started as a problem with the financial system and has spread to the “real” economy. We can see the symptoms and effect of the crisis but there is little confidence that after we come through the problem it will not happen again. In this article we look at the problem from the fundamentals of money and propose a solution that may stop the same problem reoccurring.

Continue reading

A Banking Product to Fund Renewable Energy Infrastructure

Two ways of increasing investment in greenhouse gas (ghg) reducing technologies and practices are:

  1. Raise the price of energy from fossil fuels and so encourage investment in non polluting production of energy.
  2. Decrease the capital cost of investing in ways to reduce greenhouse gases.

Of the two, the second will be the most effective, the fastest acting and the most certain. This is because it is comparatively easy to estimate how much investment is required to reduce emissions. And because we can easily reduce capital costs by removing interest payments and only requiring repayment of capital when the investments earn money.

Let us form a slightly different banking enterprise — one that takes deposits and give loans, but which only gives loans to those people making deposits. Moreover, let’s make the size of the loan dependent on the size of the deposit and stipulate that the deposit must remain with the bank until the loan is repaid. There is no interest paid on deposits or on loans.
Continue reading

Interesting Initiatives and Articles

James Robertson has been working towards the reform of the monetary system for many years. His newsletter – since 2004 – has many good references and is well worth supporting.

His work came to our notice with his article in onlineopinion titled “Money from nothing: supplying money should be a public service”.
Continue reading

Submission to National Broadband Network Greenfields

The cost of last-mile access infrastructure is a major hurdle for broadband network suppliers around the world.  Ideally the investment would be supported through the margin on the services provided over the network.  However, in practice the capital cost of establishing the network must frequently be written down before the services can become price competitive.

Continue reading